The company delivered a sufficient relief quarter, with CCB, cloud, EBIT, and EPS all exceeding Street expectations.
CCB growth of 25% was slightly ahead of the 23-24% buyside number, which had previously come down, and cloud revenues were 2% ahead of Street.
CCB at +25% cc was flat with Q4 and exceeded Street/buyside expectations, addressing the main investor fear after last quarter’s CCB disappointment.
Management stated the quarter was “very clean,” with no pull-forward, unusual incentives, and healthy deal gross margins, despite weaker pipeline conversion in the Middle East.
Management indicated that demand remains resilient, pipeline coverage is healthy, and crises can drive customers towards SAP for supply-chain and resilience projects.
Cloud ERP Suite revenue was €5.214B, +30% cc, steady with Q4 and now represents 87% of cloud revenue.
Public cloud order entry was over 70% of quarterly volume, and indirect channel order entry was nearly 30% of total order entry, growing faster than direct.
Management emphasized that the AI transition should be gradual and not financially disruptive like the on-prem-to-cloud transition, and subscription revenue should not disappear.
Less than 40% of 2025 cloud revenue was tied to named users, with the rest tied to non-seat metrics such as revenue, memory usage, or other value-related metrics.
The company highlighted external AI ROI examples and internal productivity gains, including over 30% developer productivity, 20% autonomous support ticket resolution, 83,000 GTM hours saved, and a target for ~€2B run-rate efficiency by end-2028.
Bulls will appreciate the operating leverage aspect.
The bull case is that SAP remains one of the cleaner large-cap software compounders due to its multi-year ERP cloud migration cycle, high switching costs, strong cloud backlog visibility, and improving margins.
Bulls argue that SAP’s core ERP footprint is mission-critical and not discretionary, and customers are more likely to consolidate around SAP during periods of geopolitical or supply-chain stress.
This quarter strengthened the view because CCB remained at +25% cc despite investor concerns about deceleration, Cloud ERP stayed at +30% cc, and management stated the quarter did not rely on pull-forward or discounting.
Bulls also believe AI is more likely to expand SAP’s TAM than disrupt it, with management arguing that mission-critical finance, payroll, supply-chain, procurement, and compliance workflows require SAP’s domain knowledge, semantic model, governance, and process context.
The first quarter was important because management directly addressed the fear that AI reduces seats and SaaS revenue, stating that less than 40% of cloud revenue is seat-based, subscription revenue should not disappear, and consumption revenue should layer on gradually.
The FY26 guidance was held but includes an inorganic tailwind, and the company called out some Middle East headwinds.
The numbers were not super impressive, and the print won't change the narrative or bull vs. bear case.
Management acknowledged order disruption in March/April (cancelled contract in April), and the unchanged FY26 guide implies a slight step down compared to previous expectations.
The weaker commentary for this quarter implies a 'hockey stick' recovery in the second half to meet the guidance.
Management now expects FY26 total revenue growth at cc to be similar to 2025, then accelerate in 2027; prior wording implied acceleration through 2027, with the change mainly due to services softness and macro caution.
The negative aspect was deal slippage and extended cycles in directly affected Middle East/government/energy-intensive areas, with a more severe risk if Strait of Hormuz disruption persists.
The caution is that the outlook now assumes near-term Middle East de-escalation and includes Reltio contribution, leading investors to debate whether this represents true organic resilience or a prudent guide held with an M&A buffer.
Bears will question how much AI investment is needed before monetization is material.
Services revenue missed Street expectations, and the FY26 total revenue wording was toned down to “similar” growth to 2025, with acceleration pushed to 2027.
The callback flagged Q1 cloud one-offs: snapback from previously distressed customers, Q4 2024 revenue-ramp mechanisms, and an easy Q1 2025 comp.
Q2 is expected to be tougher, with one war-related contract on hold, bigger Q2 slippage, and more stable Q3/Q4 expectations.
The bear case is that SAP’s reported resilience masks a more fragile forward setup.
Bears point out that FY26 guidance was held only after adding Reltio contribution and assuming Middle East de-escalation, while management admitted Q1 cloud had one-time benefits and Q2 cloud growth should decelerate.
The total revenue narrative moved in the wrong direction: FY26 is now expected to grow similarly to 2025 rather than accelerate, with acceleration deferred to 2027, giving bears room to argue that SAP is not immune to macro factors and that the cloud migration story may be more back-half and 2027-dependent.
Bears remain skeptical of AI, arguing that even with SAP’s strong system-of-record position, AI can pressure traditional software pricing models, reduce seat counts, and require heavier R&D/infrastructure spending.
Management’s own comments that agentic AI is still early, current accuracy is insufficient for mission-critical processes, and SAP needs to change architecture and build ontology/graph capabilities can be interpreted as evidence that AI monetization is not yet fully proven.
Bears also note that if customers can build agentic layers on top of SAP data or use hyperscaler/LLM platforms, value capture could shift away from SAP even if SAP remains the underlying system of record.